| |
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 16 | |
| 9. |  | ANDRADE JUNIOR, A. S. de; NOLETO, D. H.; SILVA, M. E. da; BRAGA, D. L.; BASTOS, E. A. Coefcientes da equação de Angström-Prescott para Parnaíba, Piauí. Comunicata Scientiae, v. 3, n. 1, p. 50-54, 2012.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Meio-Norte. |
|    |
| 10. | | NOLÊTO, D. H.; ANDRADE JUNIOR, A. S. de; BRAGA, D. L.; MOUSINHO, F. E. P.; SOUSA, C. C. Comparação de métodos empíricos de estimativa da evapotranspiração de referência para Piripiri, Piauí. In: CONGRESSO BRASILEIRO DE ENGENHARIA AGRÍCOLA, 42., 2013, Fortaleza. Anais... Fortaleza: SBEA, 2013. 4 p. 1 CD-ROM. CONBEA 2013.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Meio-Norte. |
| |
| 11. | | ANDRADE JUNIOR, A. S. de; BRAGA, D. L.; NOLETO, D. H.; SILVA, M. E.; BASTOS, E. A. Coeficientes da equação de Angström-Prescott para Parnaíba, Piauí. In: CONGRESSO BRASILEIRO DE AGROMETEOROLOGIA, 17., 2011, Guarapari. Riscos climáticos e cenários agrícolas futuros: anais... Guarapari: Incaper, 2011.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Meio-Norte. |
| |
| 14. | | ANDRADE JUNIOR, A. S. de; NOLETO, D. H.; BASTOS, E. A.; MOURA, M. S. B. de; ANJOS, J. C. R. dos. Demanda hídrica da cana-de-açúcar, por balanço de energia, na microrregião de Teresina, Piauí. Agrometeoros, Passo Fundo, v. 25, n. 1, p. 229-238, ago. 2017.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Meio-Norte; Embrapa Semiárido. |
| |
| 15. | | ANDRADE JUNIOR, A. S. de; BASTOS, E. A.; RIBEIRO, V. Q.; DUARTE, J. A. L.; BRAGA, D. L.; NOLETO, D. H. Níveis de água, nitrogênio e potássio por gotejamento subsuperficial em cana-de-açúcar. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, Brasília, v. 47, n. 1, p. 76-84, jan. 2012.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Meio-Norte; Embrapa Unidades Centrais. |
| |
| 16. | | ANJOS, J. C. R. dos; ANDRADE JUNIOR, A. S. de; BASTOS, E. A.; NOLETO, D. H.; MELO, F. de B.; BRITO, R. R. de. Water storage in a Plinthaqualf cultivated with sugarcane under straw levels. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, Brasília, DF, v. 52, n. 6, p. 464-473, jun. 2017. Título em português: Armazenamento de água em Plintossolo Argilúvico cultivado com cana-de-açúcar sob níveis de palhada.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Meio-Norte; Embrapa Unidades Centrais. |
| |
| Registros recuperados : 16 | |
|
|
|
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Meio-Norte. |
|
Data corrente: |
05/09/2012 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
18/12/2023 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Anais de Congresso |
|
Autoria: |
ANDRADE JUNIOR, A. S. de; BASTOS, E. A.; AGUIAR NETTO, A. O.; BRAGA, D. L.; SILVA, M. E.; NOLETO, D. H. |
|
Afiliação: |
ADERSON SOARES DE ANDRADE JUNIOR, CPAMN; EDSON ALVES BASTOS, CPAMN; ANTENOR O. AGUIAR NETTO, SERGIPE FEDERAL UNIVERSITY; DARLAN L. BRAGA, CEARA FEDERAL UNIVERSITY; MARIA E. SILVA, PIAUI FEDERAL UNIVERSITY; DONAVAN H. NOLETO, PIAUI FEDERAL UNIVERSITY. |
|
Título: |
Agricultural water footprint of ethanol and sugar from sugar cane under fertigation production system. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2012 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
In: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING, 2012, Valencia. Agriculture & engineering for a healthier life: abstracts. Valencia: CIGR: EurAgEng, 2012. |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
The study has objective to calculate the green, blue and grey agricultural water footprint (WF) of ethanol and sugar produced from sugar cane, under subsurface fertigation production system, in Piauí State, Brazil. Sugar and ethanol production data in response to different irrigation levels (288, 492 and 675 mm), nitrogen fertigation (90, 113 and 160 kg ha-1 N ) and potassium (60 and 133 kg ha-1 of K2O) plus a control treatment (2,080 mm of rainfall, 75 kg N ha-1 and 75 kg ha-1 of K2O) were obtained from a trial under subsurface drip irrigation system, RB 867515 sugar cane variety, 1st ratoon, conducted in COMVAP - Sugar and Alcohol Inc., União county, Piauí State, Brazil. Under subsurface drip fertigation, the agricultural WF for sugar production ranged from 1,493 L kg-1 (1,175 L kg-1 - green water, 163 L kg-1 - blue water and 155 L kg-1 - grey water) to 1,172 L kg-1 (823 L kg-1 - green water, 267 L kg-1 - blue water and 83 L kg-1 - gray water). For ethanol production, the agricultural WF ranged from 2,081 L L-1 (1,638 L L-1 - green water, 227 L L-1 - blue water and 216 L L-1 - grey water) to 1,483 L L-1 (1,040 L L-1 - green water, 338 L L-1 - blue water and 105 L L-1 - grey water). Under non-irrigated condition, the agricultural WF for sugar production was 1,915 L kg-1 (1,763 L kg-1 - green water and 152 L kg-1 - grey water) and 2,658 L L-1 (2,448 L L-1 - water green and 211 L L-1 - grey water) for ethanol production. The agricultural WF for the ethanol production was superior to sugar production. Agricultural water footprint under fertigation was lower than that obtained under non-irrigated condition, and should be a recommended practice for increasing water productivity to sugar and ethanol production from sugar cane crop in the region evaluated. MenosThe study has objective to calculate the green, blue and grey agricultural water footprint (WF) of ethanol and sugar produced from sugar cane, under subsurface fertigation production system, in Piauí State, Brazil. Sugar and ethanol production data in response to different irrigation levels (288, 492 and 675 mm), nitrogen fertigation (90, 113 and 160 kg ha-1 N ) and potassium (60 and 133 kg ha-1 of K2O) plus a control treatment (2,080 mm of rainfall, 75 kg N ha-1 and 75 kg ha-1 of K2O) were obtained from a trial under subsurface drip irrigation system, RB 867515 sugar cane variety, 1st ratoon, conducted in COMVAP - Sugar and Alcohol Inc., União county, Piauí State, Brazil. Under subsurface drip fertigation, the agricultural WF for sugar production ranged from 1,493 L kg-1 (1,175 L kg-1 - green water, 163 L kg-1 - blue water and 155 L kg-1 - grey water) to 1,172 L kg-1 (823 L kg-1 - green water, 267 L kg-1 - blue water and 83 L kg-1 - gray water). For ethanol production, the agricultural WF ranged from 2,081 L L-1 (1,638 L L-1 - green water, 227 L L-1 - blue water and 216 L L-1 - grey water) to 1,483 L L-1 (1,040 L L-1 - green water, 338 L L-1 - blue water and 105 L L-1 - grey water). Under non-irrigated condition, the agricultural WF for sugar production was 1,915 L kg-1 (1,763 L kg-1 - green water and 152 L kg-1 - grey water) and 2,658 L L-1 (2,448 L L-1 - water green and 211 L L-1 - grey water) for ethanol production. The agricultural WF for the ethanol production was supe... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Demanda de água; Irrigação por gotejamento subterrâneo. |
|
Thesagro: |
Bioenergia. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
X Pesquisa, Tecnologia e Engenharia |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/65606/1/Agricultural7390001.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02533nam a2200205 a 4500
001 1933061
005 2023-12-18
008 2012 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aANDRADE JUNIOR, A. S. de
245 $aAgricultural water footprint of ethanol and sugar from sugar cane under fertigation production system.
260 $aIn: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING, 2012, Valencia. Agriculture & engineering for a healthier life: abstracts. Valencia: CIGR: EurAgEng$c2012
520 $aThe study has objective to calculate the green, blue and grey agricultural water footprint (WF) of ethanol and sugar produced from sugar cane, under subsurface fertigation production system, in Piauí State, Brazil. Sugar and ethanol production data in response to different irrigation levels (288, 492 and 675 mm), nitrogen fertigation (90, 113 and 160 kg ha-1 N ) and potassium (60 and 133 kg ha-1 of K2O) plus a control treatment (2,080 mm of rainfall, 75 kg N ha-1 and 75 kg ha-1 of K2O) were obtained from a trial under subsurface drip irrigation system, RB 867515 sugar cane variety, 1st ratoon, conducted in COMVAP - Sugar and Alcohol Inc., União county, Piauí State, Brazil. Under subsurface drip fertigation, the agricultural WF for sugar production ranged from 1,493 L kg-1 (1,175 L kg-1 - green water, 163 L kg-1 - blue water and 155 L kg-1 - grey water) to 1,172 L kg-1 (823 L kg-1 - green water, 267 L kg-1 - blue water and 83 L kg-1 - gray water). For ethanol production, the agricultural WF ranged from 2,081 L L-1 (1,638 L L-1 - green water, 227 L L-1 - blue water and 216 L L-1 - grey water) to 1,483 L L-1 (1,040 L L-1 - green water, 338 L L-1 - blue water and 105 L L-1 - grey water). Under non-irrigated condition, the agricultural WF for sugar production was 1,915 L kg-1 (1,763 L kg-1 - green water and 152 L kg-1 - grey water) and 2,658 L L-1 (2,448 L L-1 - water green and 211 L L-1 - grey water) for ethanol production. The agricultural WF for the ethanol production was superior to sugar production. Agricultural water footprint under fertigation was lower than that obtained under non-irrigated condition, and should be a recommended practice for increasing water productivity to sugar and ethanol production from sugar cane crop in the region evaluated.
650 $aBioenergia
653 $aDemanda de água
653 $aIrrigação por gotejamento subterrâneo
700 1 $aBASTOS, E. A.
700 1 $aAGUIAR NETTO, A. O.
700 1 $aBRAGA, D. L.
700 1 $aSILVA, M. E.
700 1 $aNOLETO, D. H.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Meio-Norte (CPAMN) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
